eJournal Articles :: Kembali ::

Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts

No. Panggil : eja-21-0126
Nama Orang : Ryberg, Jesper
Penerbitan : [Place of publication not identified] : Taylor and Francis - Criminology and Law, 2021
AbstrakA traditional assumption in retributivist thinking is the view that an offenders desert is determined exclusively on the basis of the gravity of the crime committed. However, this assumption has recently been challenged. Netanel Dagan and Julian Roberts have advocated a dynamic theory of desert, or what they refer to as the dynamic censure model. According to this model, certain post-sentencing reactions in the offender should be taken into account in the determination of the offenders desert and the severity of appropriate punishment. The purpose of this article is to assess this dynamic concept of desert. I argue that despite the fact that the model offers a new and interesting approach to desert and sentencing, it also faces a range of theoretical challenges that are not easily answered.
Entri Tambahan Nama Orang
001 Hak Akses (open/membership)membership
Kata Kuncidesert, dynamic censure theory, proportionality, retributivism, sentencing
ISSN
Tahun Terbit2021
No. Indukeja-21-0126
Entri Sumber DataTaylor and Francis - Criminology and Law
Entri Utama Nama orangRyberg, Jesper
Volume, Nomor, Tahun dan Hlm.vol. 40, no. 1, p. 56-67
Barcodeeja-21-0126
Subjek Topik
Judul UtamaRetributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts
Kode Bahasaeng
Sumber KoleksiPerpustakaan Nasional
No. Panggil No. Barkod Ketersediaan
eja-21-0126 eja-21-0126 TERSEDIA
Shelf
 Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts.pdf :: Unduh

LOGIN required

Catatan: Hanya file pdf yang dapat dibaca online
Ulasan:
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 57684
Tidak ada abstrak pada koleksi ini
:: Perpustakaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian (STIK)
LONTAR 4 :: Library Automation and Digital Archive